The “real” story is long and convoluted, as all medical stories are. But I will distill it to a simple recount: they did one test (MRI); they charged me for three.
I have several MRI/ ultrasound/ CT-scan/
doppler appointments a year to check for various things in various areas of my
body: I get a heart echocardiogram (or ultrasound) once a year; a carotid ultrasound,
a leg doppler and a stress test (sometimes a nuclear stress test) every two
years, and now, more recently, an abdominal MRI (sometimes, ultrasound) every
year. They are keeping an eye on various areas in my body that show arterial
stenosis due to the built-up of plaque.
This new (and soon to be former – see: http://livingwithfh.blogspot.com/2021/04/educating-doctors-visit-to-my-vascular.html)
vascular specialist doctor ordered an abdominal MRI with and without contrast.
The day of the test, I checked with the technician that was supposed to do my
actual test what exactly the test was – like I said this was a convoluted story
and there was some iffiness from the doctor’s office about what test was actually
ordered from the radiology department, but I knew that the one thing I was
there for, the one thing the doctor and I agreed upon to watch, was my abdominal
aorta. So, I was expecting an abdominal aorta MRI.
The radiology technician confirmed he was
about to do an abdominal MRI with and without contrast. I was good.
And then, the results came a couple of days
later in MyChart: the radiology department had apparently done the following
tests that same day:
·
CARDIAC MRI HEART MORPHOLOGY
AND FUNCTION W/ WO CONTRAST
·
CARDIAC MRA CHEST WITH AND
WITHOUT CONTRAST
·
CARDIAC MRI ABDOMEN ANGIOGRAM
WITH AND WITHOUT CONTRAST
I opened each of these tests in MyChart to
look for the results of each one. They had copied and pasted the exact same results
from clearly an abdominal MRI test: there was no mention of the heart, no
mention of the chest arteries, no mention of the heart morphology – there were just
mentions of the abdominal aorta, the renal aorta, the mesenteric, and iliac aortas.
Also, I noticed that one of the tests said “cardiac MRI angiogram” and what I
had was not an angiogram … And each of the three tests had identical – letter for
letter – results. Obviously, they were not the same test (why the different names?),
but they had the same findings. I was just a little bit upset, you can say.
I panicked, because I know that when the
doctor says they did a test and it shows up in your MyChart Test Results
section, the next place you’ll see them will be in your bill. I have done these
tests enough to know they are never lower than a couple of thousands of dollars
(usually more) each.
I approached the mix-up with the doctor who
ordered the tests, and he insisted that all three of them had been done. I
asked him to show me the results of all of them. He could not – he had the same
results three times over, as did I, on my end, in MyChart. He insisted that the
tests were done (although I told him time and again that I verified with the radiology
tech about what test I was receiving and he did not say I was getting three tests),
and that the radiology doctor sent the wrong results. The doctor contacted the
radiology doctor after I left his office.
I was almost in tears, because by then I
had received the bill which showed I owed roughly $12,000 – about $4000 for
each of the three tests. I am lucky to have insurance, but I had not met my deductible
and even after that, I was still responsible for a chunk of the cost. It also
felt unfair that even the insurance should have to pay for tests I did not get
nor that were needed at that time.
A couple of hours after I left the doctor’s
office the doctor himself called me to apologize: he talked to the radiology
doctor and they had made a mistake: they in fact confirmed what I said all
along, that they had performed one test and that was the abdominal MRI without
the angiogram part of it and that the other two should be taken out of my
account.
A couple of days later, the head of the
billing department called me with an apology to assure me that I will only be
responsible for one test, an abdominal MRI, and that the other two will be
taken out of my bill. I told them the bill was already sent to the insurance
who paid their share and they assured me they will refund the money to the insurance
and that the insurance overpaid (how many times does this happen: hospitals
reimbursing insurance companies?!).
In the end, the final bill was for around
$4000 for just one of the three tests, but I wonder how many times this slips
and people are overcharged for what they did not get done. Especially for
chronic patients, like us, who have a number of tests done every year. I know
people who are not savvy enough to read their results online and see what they
describe; they just trust what the doctor says and move on. They would have
received the bill, shaken their heads that the darn medical system is way over-bloated
(which still is) and would have paid.
Some lessons this has taught (or reminded) me (of):
- Always pay attention to the tests they recommend and try to understand what they are for and whether they are needed.
- Question multiple tests – are they for the same thing? Can one test cover the scope of all the multiple tests?
- Ask the doctor to explain whether you need an MRI or would an ultrasound (typically cheaper, but not as accurate as an MRI) be good enough? For areas that are larger (think a whole organ versus one small artery), ultrasounds are usually enough.
- Always read your results and try to make sense of them even if it is just to ask your doctor additional questions about your treatment plan.
- Look at your bill twice: does each charge verify and match your real experience. If not, call the doctor’s office first; remember that the insurance only bills for what they receive from the medical institution. Start with the doctors/ clinic/ hospital to understand why they told you one thing and sent the insurance something else.
In short, as always: stay alert and be your own advocate. Always.
