A Mixed Bag: Some Good Things, Some Bad, and a Whole Bunch of Guessing, as Usual

Today was an odd appointment with my cardiologist, to say the least. It was my 3-month appointment (this is routine for me), where we were supposed to discuss the recent tests that he had ordered (a heart echo, a carotid ultrasound, recent blood work, and the results of my neurological tests) and, as always, assess if there are any changes needed in medication.

Right off the bat, he admitted that he didn’t review my tests before he walked in the room. He said he did see them when they were done (in September), but he had not reviewed them this morning before he walked in the room (intern in tow) to see me. So, he needed a minute. (My appointment was at 8:40 AM and he was already an hour late, so I guess: busy morning!)

My cholesterol went up slightly, as you can see below, but he said he will consider it a “lab error”. Well, which one was the error: the last one that showed it the lowest I have ever had it? Or this time, which is more in line with everything else we’ve done for the past year? No answer.

My AST (a liver enzyme) is elevated but only slightly (43 U/L and it’s normal between 15-41 U/L). But I have had it as low as 26, so … there is some reason for concern there. He said to repeat it in 3 months before our next appointment. We repeat the same tests before every appointment: a lipid panel, a liver and renal panel, a uric acid (because of the Nexletol/ bempedoic acid which elevates the uric acid and because in my 20’s I used to have gout attacks frequently).  The AST is part of the liver panel. He asked me if I want to do an extra measurement at 6 weeks but he said “he didn’t care; it was up to me”. OK, then … let’s just do them all at the same time which is in 3 months. (I love when he says “he doesn’t care” or “to him it’s six of this or half a dozen of the other”. Sounds so reassuring!)

My heart echo write-up mentioned for the first time “diastolic disfunction”. I asked him about this and he explained that what this means is when the heart fills up with blood, it increases in volume but it should not increase in pressure. In my case, there is some pressure that is measurable, but that it is “mild”. He said this is “normal” and “almost expected” in my case, having had a heart attack, open-heart surgery, and coronary vascular disease for many years. He said he is not extra concerned about it, as long as my aortic valve is clear (which it is) and my ejection fraction is good, which at 55% it is.

The narrowing of all my carotid arteries is increased compared to the measurements of two years ago, but the percentage is all the same – between 50-69%. This seems like a huge range to me, but that’s where they place my numbers.

For those more curious, here are my measurements for both the right (first) and the left (second) carotid arteries:

MEASUREMENTS – Right/ Left
------------------ -------------- --------------

Central Carotid Artery
CCA Proximal 249/ 19 cm/sec - 216/ 23 cm/sec
CCA Mid 168/ 21 cm/sec - 230/ 23 cm/sec
CCA Distal 141/ 19 cm/sec - 199/ 24 cm/sec

Internal Carotid Artery
ICA Proximal 136/ 24 cm/sec - 191/ 22 cm/sec
ICA Mid 189/ 36 cm/sec - 134/ 21 cm/sec
ICA Distal 160/ 30 cm/sec - 157/ 22 cm/sec

CCA/ICA Ratios 1.340 - 0.960

External Carotid Artery
ECA 550 - 260
Vertebral 93/ 16 cm/sec - 115/ 15 cm/sec
Subclavian 305 - 327

He said that the worst narrowing is in my External Carotid which is of least concern, because it’s the one that vascularizes the face which gets blood supplies from a “million other places” (his words), so there is no concern for no blood supply there.

I have an appointment with a vascular surgeon and he asked me to follow up with him for a second opinion on the carotid findings.

If it were not for me to mention the neurological test that he ordered to diagnose peripheral neuropathy, he would not have discussed it. I told him that the test showed that I did not have peripheral neuropathy. He was glad about that. He had suspected there was something neurologically wrong because my dizzy spells. Well, not sure what worked, but my dizzy spells are very mild now and very infrequent, and my muscle spasms and cramps are also much better, too. The dizziness definitely does not last for a whole day anymore. I started taking CoQ10 (my decision) which I guess must have made my muscle cramps less frequent, but I don’t think that it had anything to do with fixing the dizzy spells. In addition, my primary doctor diagnosed me with possibly anemia (low red cell count) and a B12 deficiency, so I started taking B12 vitamin supplements at about the same time as the CoQ10 – about 2-3 months ago. He agreed that this deficiency and the anemia could have caused the dizziness for sure. So, we’ll just continue with this treatment and the regular doctor is planning to check the B12 levels again at our 6 month follow-up.

We also talked about the heart symptoms: how’s the blood pressure, how’s the chest pain, how is the shortness of breath? How do I get along with the newest drug he put me on to treat all these (Amlodipine). I told him that the chest pain and shortness of breath are stationary, but I have more stamina when I walk (I can go further and on steeper inclines through the shortness of breath and the angina because I feel like my heart is getting enough blood supply). My neck still cramps, but after a longer walk. The blood pressure is medium-high (in the yellow-orange range on the machine) a lot more often than mostly high (red range), like it was before the Amlodipine. My gums are still very sensitive because of the Amlodipine but I am working with the dentist to use softer brushes, better paste to not irritate them too much.

After the physical consult, he said he thinks “I have more fluid than what he would like for me to have” and to back off the salt. This is the first time in my “heart-patient career” that anyone has said anything about salt, because typically my fluid is under control. He said my legs look fine but that my chest shows signs of too much fluid. He gave no reason as to why all of a sudden my fluid retention is higher, and no recommendation on what to stop or start doing (other than salt intake) to help with this.

As for the FH treatment, he said he would like to try the “twice a year siRNA PCSK9 inhibitor which might come out in the US sometimes next year” – his guess -  (he was referring to Inclisiran - https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-receives-eu-approval-leqvio-inclisiran-first-class-sirna-lower-cholesterol-two-doses-year) to replace the twice-weekly Praluent injections that I take now. I have asked him again (http://livingwithfh.blogspot.com/2021/07/who-knows-more-about-fh-you-or-your.html) about adding Evkeeza to the current treatment and he said “that would be another option as well”, but he made no recommendations about it. About this, I am puzzled: my LDL is nowhere near the “target” number of 70 mg/dl or lower, but he did not recommend adding anything else to my current drug regimen.

So, a mix of findings and if I were to summarize, I would say:

-          Heart function is stationary (no idea what the coronary arteries are doing because we would need a cath angiogram for that)

-          Arteries are showing advancing disease

-          Cholesterol (LDL) is still elevated, not at ideal levels for my disease and my history

-          Liver function a bit modified

-          Quality of life/ symptoms (dizziness, muscle cramps, chest pain and shortness of breath) somewhat improved.

I walk gently towards The Holidays with kind of a mixed bag and lots of unanswered questions. But … it’s better than six years ago when I was walking in with “you must have open-heart surgery in one to three months at the longest.” So, I’ll take it.