Sunday, May 21, 2023

Treating Heart Disease, Haggling-style

As readers of this blog probably already know, once you have cholesterol which is only somewhat managed but not fully, you start getting the additional baggage of heart disease and sometimes even strokes. So, as you well know, I manage two diseases - both high cholesterol and heart disease, hence the name of this blog. 


This entry is about how I have been trying to manage my heart failure condition in the past few months to a year now. My heart failure is only one of the several heart-related diagnoses that I have been saddled with. Some others are coronary artery disease (CAD), aortic stenosis, and atherosclerosis. 


I was diagnosed with a high BNP value in 2017 (for more information on that first diagnosis see this post from that year: ​​https://livingwithfh.blogspot.com/2017/05/cholesterol-and-heart-health-update.html). At that time, it was 285 pg/ml. But at that time, they did not call it heart failure yet. That didn’t happen until 2022. 


BNP shows the amount of damage in your heart and helps the cardiologist diagnose the level of your heart failure. My type  of heart failure is “Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction” which is a category all of its own. All other categories are different degrees of “heart failure with reduced ejection fraction”. My ejection fraction is good (unlike the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), but the heart muscle is stiff which is what causes the high pressure, along with other symptoms, like shortness of breath. Outside of the BNP test required to measure the heart failure (a blood test which is not cheap - around $285 without insurance at my clinic), they can also measure the ejection fraction during your heart echocardiogram test which is something I get once a year. During this test, they can also see whether your heart is enlarged or not (more common with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction). Putting all these data points together, they can diagnose more precisely which type of heart failure (HF) you have. The treatments for any of the types vary slightly, so a correct diagnosis is preferred. 


Things have gotten worse for me since 2017 when they first measured an elevated BNP. It kept climbing all throughout last year, during which time my shortness of breath kept getting worse. For example, I could not go up one flight of stairs without feeling completely out of breath; nor could I walk across the living room with a half-full laundry basket en route to my laundry room without panting like a dog at the end of the 20 feet trek. Not ideal for a 47 year old who is not overweight. 


In November of last year, the BNP was the highest that it’s ever been, since we’ve measured it, at 692 pg/ml. Along with a worsening shortness of breath and higher BNP, my blood pressure has not been totally controlled, more often being around 160/ 50-60’s and more seldom measuring at around 120 / 50. Some days, it spiked to 180’s, too. 


During this time, the cardiologist continued to “play” with various drugs to try to manage my blood pressure, first. The belief is that if we control the pressure better, less damage is done to the heart muscle and the BNP will ultimately improve. 


I call it “playing” with the drugs because that’s exactly how it feels. When he decides to add drugs or change drugs for my blood pressure, the conversation goes something like this:


Doctor: Well, we could add the Spironolactone which is a diuretic and it’s a drug older than you are, or, we could add Farxiga which is a diabetes drug and newer. Which one do you want to try? It’s sixes to me! (this is all an almost exact quote)


Me: Well, what do they do? How are they different? (I am not sure that all patients ask this, but they should!).


Doctor: Well, one of them takes the water out of your system, the other takes the sugar out. Both have good results on improving heart function and ultimately BNP.


Me: Which one has fewer side effects? 


Doctor: They are both generally well tolerated, but the Spironolactone elevates your potassium, so we need to measure that periodically and ensure it stays low. No other side effects to worry about. (I have always struggled with a doctor telling me that a drug “is generally well tolerated”. I understand this is all they have sometimes, but I have found that the tolerance is always in the eyes of the beholder. And they never account for that.)


Me (dubious as I know from experience he leaves many side effects out): 

Well, I have not heard of either one, so let me research them and get back with you. 


And he lets me go home and we’ll talk about it at the next appointment, in three months... Then, I choose one (depending on what I find on the internet and what concerns I might have), and he works on the right dosage and how often to take it. And he puts me on it, we try it out for a while, I report any side effects, because there are always side effects (including ones the pamphlets never mention), and I decide whether the side effects are worth living with or we need to stop. 


The dialogue above happened sometime last year, when my BNP kept climbing up slowly till in November it got to 692 and my shortness of breath kept getting progressively worse. Before then, he tried many other drugs - I have been on Amlodipine since 2020; he also tried Losartan and Ramipril. But the blood pressure never really seemed to budge much. 


And then, he added Spironolactone. The blood pressure finally came down - my pattern was now reversed - more days of 120 / 50 and fewer days of 169 / 60. But the chest pressure was only marginally better, if noticeably better at all. And I started getting more palpitations and more panic-attack-type episodes than ever before ... But I stuck with it, because I wanted to see how the BNP would fare. 


He repeated the BNP in December and in February and both times, it was only slightly lower than when we started (581 and 598, respectively). So, finally, in February, I told him I am not sure I should continue with the Spironolactone. The side effects and the little benefit I was seeing did not justify everything else that was not conducive to a qualitatively good life.  I texted him (a luxury, I know, that I have with this particular cardiologist to be able just to text him!) and he said “Stop taking the Spironolactone.” That was that. Not replace it with something else, double up on the other things you’re taking (Amlodipine and Atenolol). Just stop! We have a follow-up appointment later this month, so I guess he figured he’ll make me guess on some new drugs again then! 


I stopped the Spironolactone but I started taking Amlodipine twice a day instead of once a day, basically doubling the daily dose at the very same time he told me to stop the other drug. The doubling was a judgment call I made, after remembering that he told me years ago that the dose of Amlodipine I was taking was a “child dose” (I am very sensitive to any amount of any drug, so he usually starts me on lower doses). So, I figured, if we double a child’s dose, we might get a better response for the blood pressure and by now I have gotten used to the side effects from Amlodipine. He was fine with that. 


Since February, when I made this change, the chest pressure has gotten so much better, the blood pressure continues to stay low, still with occasional spikes, but more rare, and the BNP dropped to 388 when we measured it in April this year - so, almost half of when it was the highest last year. Still too high (the normal is again, below 190 pg/ml), but I take any improvement. The trouble with doubling the Amlodipine, however, is more edema (swelling in the legs and feet) and more sensitive gums (more bleeding when brushing my teeth). You always have to know your body, notice what happens and try to weigh the bad against the good and try to figure out what is manageable for you. I am sure many of you out there would make totally different choices than me, when presented with the same alternatives as I have been. 


I am not sure what, if anything, he might suggest next. He has been bugging me about the Farxiga drug for several appointments now, but I am not sure about it. We will see ... 


On another note, (almost) no idea why this happened during this time, but my LDL cholesterol has come up since November. I have not changed anything about my diet, and outside of “playing” with the heart drugs, I have not introduced any other drugs. However, I lost my dad in November. My own grieving process and managing my mom’s depression from afar (she is in Romania and I am in the US) through her own grieving during this time has been excruciatingly hard. There are many proven studies that show that cholesterol rises with stress (has to do with a higher level of cortisol, the stress hormone, in your body - you can google this and there are virtually thousands of sources speaking about this). 



The latest change in my cholesterol levels


This is just a guess on my part. I have communicated to my cardiologist on several occasions that I am under a lot of stress lately, but when the cholesterol results came back earlier this month, I still got a note from him saying “don’t know why LDL is up. Will talk.” 


If I have learned anything during this journey, it is that the research I do on my own is just as effective, sometimes even more so, than the advice I get from my doctors. It is unfortunate and wrong, but it’s what it is. And I am not sure what broke what: the fact that the patients are more knowledgeable now than they were before caused the doctors to pay less attention and be less educated? Or the fact that the doctors are so much more super-specialized and not as thoroughly trained as before caused the internet to fill in the gaps because the demand from the patients is definitely there?! 


Like the cardio guy said to me: it’s sixes to me. I get my information from him, from other specialists and from the internet and try to make the best decisions. I figure the average of all those opinions is still better than doing nothing. 


Stay healthy, you all! And never stop fighting for your answers.